“Relectron: Apple Board Urges Shareholders to Reject Plan to Gut Diversity Efforts”

**Apple’s Board of Directors Recommends Voting Against Diversity Program Repeal Proposal**

In a recent proxy filing, Apple Inc.’s board of directors has recommended that investors vote against a proposal submitted by the National Public Policy Center, a conservative think tank, to repeal the company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) program.

The proposal, which has been gaining traction, asks Apple to consider abolishing its “inclusion and diversity programs, policies, departments, and goals,” citing recent Supreme Court rulings and the potential for litigation, reputational, and financial risks associated with DEI programs. The National Public Policy Center argued that these programs may make Apple more vulnerable to lawsuits, but the company responded by stating that it has a comprehensive compliance program and that the proposal is an improper attempt to micromanage its business strategy.

According to the filing, Apple is committed to being an equal opportunity employer and does not discriminate in recruiting, hiring, training, or promotion on any basis protected by law. The company’s stance on diversity and inclusion is rooted in its core values and is essential to its business strategy.

Apple’s decision to recommend voting against the proposal comes amidst a growing conservative backlash against diversity initiatives that have been implemented in various companies in the wake of the 2020 protests following the police killing of George Floyd and other Black Americans. Several major companies, including Meta and Amazon, have begun phasing out their diversity programs in response to increasing pressure from conservative groups.

The backlash against DEI programs has intensified following a 2023 U.S. Supreme Court ruling striking down affirmative action in college admissions decisions. This ruling has emboldened conservative groups to denounce DEI programs and threaten to sue companies over them. Some argue that these programs are not only ineffective but also pose a threat to free speech and equal opportunity employment.

**Changes in the Business Environment**

The changes in the business environment have caused concern among advocates for diversity and inclusion. Companies that have scrapped their DEI programs may lose talent and customers who value diversity and inclusion in the workplace. Further, abandoning these initiatives may damage a company’s reputation and its commitment to social responsibility.

Apple’s decision to recommend voting against the proposal highlights the company’s commitment to diversity and inclusion. By maintaining its DEI program, Apple sends a message that it values and prioritizes diversity and inclusion in its business practices.

**Impact on Apple and the Future of DEI Programs**

While Apple’s recommendations do not preclude the possibility of the proposal passing, it is a signal that the company is not ready to abolish its DEI program. The outcome of the proposal will likely have a significant impact on the company’s reputation and commitment to diversity and inclusion.

As the outcome of the proposal is determined, it remains to be seen whether other companies will follow suit and phase out their DEI programs. One thing is certain: the backlash against diversity initiatives has reached a boiling point, and companies will be forced to navigate this complex issue in the coming years.

**FAQs**

Q: What is the purpose of Apple’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) program?

A: The program aims to promote diversity and inclusion throughout Apple’s business practices and create a workplace where all employees feel valued and respected.

Q: What is the National Public Policy Center’s proposal to Apple?

A: The proposal asks Apple to consider abolishing its DEI programs, policies, departments, and goals, citing potential risks associated with DEI initiatives.

Q: What does the National Public Policy Center argue?

A: The center argues that DEI programs pose litigation, reputational, and financial risks to companies and make them more vulnerable to lawsuits.

Q: What is Apple’s stance on the proposal?

A: Apple has a comprehensive compliance program and states that the proposal is an improper attempt to micromanage its business strategy.

Q: Why is the idea of dropping DEI programs gaining traction?

A: The idea is gaining traction due to a conservative backlash against diversity initiatives that was intensified by recent Supreme Court rulings and the 2020 protests.

Q: What is the impact of the Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action in college admissions?

A: The ruling has emboldened conservative groups to denounce DEI programs and threaten to sue companies over them, citing concerns about free speech and equal opportunity employment.

**FAQ JSON-ld Markup**

“`json
{
“@context”: “https://schema.org”,
“@type”: “FAQPage”,
“name”: “Apple’s DEI Program Proposal FAQs”,
“mainEntity”: [
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “What is the purpose of Apple’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) program?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “The program aims to promote diversity and inclusion throughout Apple’s business practices and create a workplace where all employees feel valued and respected.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “What is the National Public Policy Center’s proposal to Apple?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “The proposal asks Apple to consider abolishing its DEI programs, policies, departments, and goals, citing potential risks associated with DEI initiatives.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “What does the National Public Policy Center argue?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “The center argues that DEI programs pose litigation, reputational, and financial risks to companies and make them more vulnerable to lawsuits.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “What is Apple’s stance on the proposal?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “Apple has a comprehensive compliance program and states that the proposal is an improper attempt to micromanage its business strategy.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “Why is the idea of dropping DEI programs gaining traction?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “The idea is gaining traction due to a conservative backlash against diversity initiatives that was intensified by recent Supreme Court rulings and the 2020 protests.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “What is the impact of the Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action in college admissions?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “The ruling has emboldened conservative groups to denounce DEI programs and threaten to sue companies over them, citing concerns about free speech and equal opportunity employment.”
}
}
] }
“`

**Conclusion**

In conclusion, Apple’s decision to recommend voting against the proposal to repeal its DEI program highlights the importance of diversity and inclusion in business practices. While the outcome of the proposal remains uncertain, the debate surrounding DEI programs is a significant issue that will continue to shape the business environment in the coming years. As companies navigate this complex issue, they will be forced to consider the potential consequences of their decisions and the impact on their reputation, talent, and customers.