“Harmony Reborn: Anthropic and Music Publishers Strike a Chord in Historic Lyric Dispute Resolution”

Title: Anthropic Reaches Agreement with Music Publishers to Settle Copyright Infringement Lawsuit

In a recent development, Anthropic, a popular AI model maker, has agreed to settle parts of a copyright infringement lawsuit brought against it by several music publishers. The lawsuit alleged that Anthropic’s AI system, Claude, had been training on protected song lyrics without permission, resulting in the chatbot providing responses that contained significant portions of those lyrics.

Background
———-

In October 2023, several music publishers, including Universal Music Group, ABKCO, Concord Music Group, and Greg Nelson Music, filed a lawsuit against Anthropic for allegedly training its AI system on lyrics from over 500 protected songs. The lawsuit claimed that when the chatbot was prompted for the lyrics to popular songs like Beyoncé’s “Halo,” Mark Ronson’s “Uptown Funk,” and Maroon 5’s “Moves like Jagger,” it provided responses that contained all or significant portions of those lyrics.

The music publishers alleged that Anthropic intentionally removed or altered copyright management information from the impacted songs when ingesting data found on online platforms like Genius to train its AI models.

Agreement
———-

As part of the agreement, Anthropic has agreed to maintain the existing guardrails it has implemented to prevent its AI models from infringing on copyrighted content. The company will also apply these guardrails to any future AI systems it develops.

The music publishers and Anthropic will work together in good faith to resolve any instances where the guardrails are deemed ineffective. If a dispute arises, the court will be ready to settle the matter.

In a statement, Anthropic emphasized that its AI system is not designed for copyright infringement and that it has implemented numerous processes to prevent such infringement. The company is committed to demonstrating that using potentially copyrighted material in the training of generative AI models is a quintessential fair use.

Conclusion
———-

The agreement reached between Anthropic and the music publishers is a significant development in the ongoing debate over the use of copyrighted material in AI model training. While the music publishers have requested a preliminary injunction to bar Anthropic from training future models on their protected song lyrics, the court’s decision is expected to be made in the coming months.

In the meantime, Anthropic’s commitment to maintaining its existing guardrails and working with music publishers to resolve any issues is a positive step towards addressing concerns over copyright infringement.

FAQ
—

Q: What is the main issue in the lawsuit against Anthropic?
A: The lawsuit claims that Anthropic’s AI system, Claude, has been training on protected song lyrics without permission, resulting in the chatbot providing responses that contain significant portions of those lyrics.

Q: Which music publishers are involved in the lawsuit?
A: Several music publishers, including Universal Music Group, ABKCO, Concord Music Group, and Greg Nelson Music, have filed a lawsuit against Anthropic.

Q: What is the purpose of the agreement between Anthropic and the music publishers?
A: The agreement aims to prevent Anthropic’s AI models from infringing on copyrighted content and to establish a procedure for music publishers to intervene when copyright infringement is suspected.

Q: Will the agreement resolve the entire lawsuit?
A: No, the agreement only settles parts of the lawsuit. The music publishers have requested a preliminary injunction to bar Anthropic from training future models on their protected song lyrics, with the court expected to issue a ruling in the coming months.